Friday, 30 July 2010

WORKSHOP? I THOUGHT YOU SAID ...


Today, REDP has organised a free full day of training for members of its Core Reference Group (and others) on community cohesion at the Holocaust Education Centre in Laxton, near Newark. I'm offered the chance to get a lift from Leicester, but decide to show my independence by getting there by public transport. A combination of train and two buses look simple enough. Yeah, right ...

I get to Nottingham in time to catch the first bus, but then realise that I've mixed up the Broadmarsh Bus Station (the only one I've used in the city) with the Victoria Bus Station (from where the bus I want departs). So I miss that one. I text Laura Horton, REDP Project Manager, who has organised the day, to check if it's still worthwhile coming late or if it would be more of an insult to turn up an hour late. She says that I should get there when I can. I ask the bus driver to let me know when we get to the stop I need in New Ollerton. According to the timetable, we should get there in just under an hour. An hour and a half later, I go forward to ask the driver, "Are we there yet?". "Sorry mate, I thought you'd got off" he tells me. I politely challenge that, so he clarifies things by telling me, "Sorry mate, I didn't understand your accent when you got on. Didn't know where you were asking for." I thought I'd ask him how he knew what to charge me for my ticket then, but couldn't really seeing this going anywhere useful at this point. I'm sure that he's been driving much faster than this old bus is meant to do and we've been hurled around like dried peas in a tin can for the past 90 minutes, so I'm glad to get off in one piece.

Next stop Worksop. It's my first visit there. There's a conveniently situated train station that allows me to get back to Nottingham. I'd got up at 0530 to make sure I managed this trip according to plan. I arrived back in Leicester at 1500, after achieving nothing more than a coach trip round Nottinghamshire. I'm sure I'd have enjoyed that if it's what I'd actually wanted to do today.

Wednesday, 28 July 2010

blessed are the peacemakers

Our Chair (Manjula Sood) and Vice Chair (Tony Nelson) saw - and made some amendments to - the letter to the Leicester Mercury before it was emailed to their Mailbox eafrly this evening. It was copied to several other members, one of whom responded by calling it "eirenic". I had to look up the definition of this word. Here's the first online definition I found:
eirenic adj. promoting peace. eirenicism, noun. such state of mind. eirenicon, noun. such act. eirenics, noun. theology aiming at religious unity.
Religions are known to encourage their followers to be be at peace. Most people who would call themselves religious would be glad to be in such a state. But greater than being at peace oneself is the act of bringing it to others. It would be a good result if this letter could be seen as an example of that by a wide number of readers. that would count as a good response by the Council of Faiths.

I know that to say, "you learn something new every day" is a truism, but I find that to be the case in this job.

Local Democracy Week (1)

A meeting at the Welcome Centre this afternoon involving Manjula Sood (our Chair), Tony Nelson (our Vice-Chair), myself and Peter Bradley from Speakers' Corner Trust about Local Democracy Week.

Leicester City Council's Adult Learning and Skills Service is charged by the City Council with "targetting activities to engage people in local democratic processes". The Service hopes for a strong presence from local organisations who are committed to public debate and the potential of informal adult learning.

Most of the text below comes from "The Speaker's Corner Initiative and Leicester City Council: A Programme for Local Democracy Week", a briefing note written by Peter Bradley.

Introduction
Speakers’ Corner Trust (SCT) is a registered charity which promotes public debate and active citizenship as a means of revitalising civil society in the UK (and supporting its development in emerging democracies). Its work includes both the promotion of local projects and the development of national programmes, many of which provide resources and support for the projects.

At local level, SCT typically works in the first instance with local authorities to recruit local stakeholders to independent Speakers’ Corner Committees which in due course take ownership of the project.

Their work might include the establishment of permanent Speakers’ Corners in public spaces as platforms for free expression and exchange (and potent symbols of citizens’ rights) but their priority will always be to stimulate and support public deliberation and debate.

At the heart of each local initiative lies a programme of events designed by the local Committee to reach every community in its area. They could include debates led by local interest groups, consultations mounted by public services or local politicians or discussions stimulated by academics or others on subjects from the global to the local to the cultural.

The central principle in all these events is that they should be accessible to all, strictly non-partisan and non-adversarial, welcome diversity and seek to inform opinion, identify common ground – and, as often as possible, enrich and entertain.

SCT’s approach is based on the belief that association between citizens and the free, face-to-face exchange of ideas, information and opinions - with each other as well as with the decision-takers among them - is a key to rebuilding trust and participation in governance and sustaining vibrant, cohesive communities.

Leicester City Council has been awarded ‘lead accountable body’ status (LAB) with the responsibility, as envisaged in the previous Government’s The Learning Revolution white paper, for developing a local partnership, vision and plan for informal adult education which encourages and enables people to continue learning throughout their lives. Among the tasks identified as priorities for LABs is “targeting activities to engage people in local democratic processes”.

This brief paper outlines proposals for a programme of activities which the Council, with SCT and other local partners, will undertake during Local Democracy Week (15-19 October). The proposal has been framed so that the programme can comprise either a self-contained initiative or the prelude to a longer term Speakers’ Corner project.

The Proposal
SCT proposes to work with the Council and other key stakeholders in Leicester, including other public services, the education sector, voluntary organisations, community groups and the business community, to organise a range of ‘Speakers’ Corner’ events during the course of Local Democracy Week. In broad terms, the aim of the programme will be to
  • involve as wide as possible a cross section of Leicester’s communities in the discussion and debate of a range of issues of importance to them;
  • provide platforms for sectors of Leicester’s community which are seldom heard;
  • create opportunities for constructive engagement between the public and local policy makers and decision takers.

Developing the Initiative
As outlined above, SCT promotes its local projects by forming Speakers’ Corner Committees made up of representatives of the public, private and voluntary sectors which ‘own’ and steer them. The credibility of the Committees as authoritative but independent bodies representing the broad community is essential to the success of the Speakers’ Corner initiative.
 
As this project is time-limited (though it is hoped that it may give rise to a longer term initiative), SCT will as a priority work with the Council to identify potential members of a steering committee (rather than a fully fledged Speakers’ Corner Committee) which could include representatives of

  • the City Council (possibly both Member and officer)
  • the Leicester Partnership
  • other public services (the police/PCT)
  • the education sector (higher/further/secondary)
  • the CVS
  • local arts organisations (in particular theatre)
  • local media (in particular local daily paper)
  • the multifaith forum
  • trades council (if appropriate)
  • chamber of commerce (if appropriate)

An Outline Programme
The Democracy Week programme could, subject to further discussion and the steering committee’s approval, comprise a launch event in a prominent open air city centre location (perhaps with appropriate historic associations); a series of events throughout the week in different locations including perhaps
  • the Council Chamber
  • neighbourhood community centres
  • schools
  • places of work
  • places of worship

Developing Partnerships
While the City Council will have a key coordinating and promotional role to play, much of the organisation of the events could be undertaken by other bodies, particularly those which should especially benefit from the initiative.

There are extensive networks of voluntary groups and organisations in every community. Most have important issues and causes to promote but many struggle to be heard. The Speakers’ Corner project is designed to provide them with an important platform in return for which the groups themselves will often take the lead in organising events, suggesting topics, securing speakers (and sometimes venues) and advertising the initiative among their membership and mailing lists.

Particularly if they have sufficient notice so that their participation can be included in their curriculum planning, schools and colleges are also often keen to participate in Speakers’ Corner events. At the launch of the Lichfield project, for example, students from three secondary schools spoke on a range of issues and several volunteered to speak again on the project’s first anniversary.

Universities also represent very considerable resources in terms of their intellectual capacities, student populations, facilities and potential as venues.

The press and media are also important partners, both as potential participants and in the promotion and reporting of events.

The Launch Event
As suggested above, the programme could be launched at an event in Leicester’s city centre. SCT is currently developing a mobile Speakers’ Corner which could provide a platform both here and subsequently at local (indoor) events.

The central event could comprise:

  • an introductory speech on the theme of Democracy Week by the Council Leader
  • a brief speech on the importance of free/self expression by a local celebrity
  • contributions from young people from local schools
  • contributions from members of the public
  • an element of performance/entertainment 

‘Local’ Debates
The steering committee would be responsible for determining the number of events and subjects for debate which are likely to reflect the city’s diverse communities and sectors and feature topics which will include though not necessarily be limited to local issues.

The summary below describes the events held on a single day at the launch of the Speakers’ Corner project in Nottingham and illustrates the range of topics, venues, formats and times which can be used to attract different target audiences.
Listening to Mothers – a discussion at Community Centre in Bulwell on the challenges of parenthood and the needs of young mothers. Representatives of the City Council and the Primary Care Trust came to listen and learn and by the end of the event, the mothers had set up a self-help group.
The Best of Both Worlds – a packed discussion in the Council Chamber in which older people talked about the advantages of modern living and younger people speculated about how life might have been better in past times. The debate was such a success that it overran by half an hour.
Common Ground – a discussion which was chaired by a Muslim woman and took place in a Synagogue bringing together members of Nottingham’s Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Baha’i and Christian communities to discuss the articles of faith and principle which unite Britain’s mainstream religions.
Future Gazing – a discussion in the Council House led by four distinguished academics on the direction in which science and technology are taking us, how they may change our lives and how we may have to change our thinking and our values both to exploit and control progress.
Getting the Best Out of Our Neighbourhoods – in a Community Centre in Sneinton, in which members of the local community asked, what are the strengths of our community and how can we play to them? What do we need to improve the quality of life in the short, medium and long terms? 
The Future of Football – in the Council House, uniting Nottingham Forest and Notts County fans and a panel including the former Forest player and manager Frank Clark to ask what’s right and wrong with football? Do the fans get what they deserve? What will it take for England to win again? What changes would make football a better experience? 
Less formal events could also contribute to the programme. At open air People’s Hustings organised by Speakers’ Corner Committees in Bristol, Nottingham, Lincoln and Lichfield in the run-up to the 2010 general election, local voluntary groups took centre stage by setting the agenda for the politicians who responded to their priorities for public policy and local action on issues as diverse as recycling, social enterprise, homelessness, overseas aid, debt, barriers to employment and environmental protection.

The mobile Speakers’ Corner could be used in a number of locations to provide a platform for local voluntary and community groups as well as members of the public.

Public Speaking Workshops
Everyone has good ideas and strong opinions. But few have the confidence or experience to communicate them to others. Wherever SCT works, it seeks the support of local theatres in providing training for members of the public in the skills required to speak confidently and effectively in public.

For example, free workshops have been conducted at the Nottingham Playhouse, Lichfield’s Garrick Theatre and the Bristol Old Vic at which professional actors and trainers have coached members of the public in the techniques of speaking in public and several have subsequently spoken at their local Speakers’ Corner.

It is hoped that theatres in Leicester might also be prepared to

  • run free workshops for members of the public who would be asked to perform at the launch event; these could take place at the theatre and/or in community centres or schools;
  • run free/subsidised workshops in participating schools;
  • perhaps help secure a celebrity for the launch event.

Creating a Record
Securing a record of some at least of the discussions and debates would be a distinct advantage, particularly if they focus on issues of public policy.

The local Universities and Colleges are likely to have media studies departments which may be able, with sufficient notice, to include in their course work assignments either to film and/or to create a documentary treatment of the initiative.

The Longer Term
Much of the work required to plan and organise the Democracy Week initiative could also contribute to the establishment of a permanent Speakers’ Corner project in the city. Indeed, if the October events are successful, there may well be demand for more.

In designing the initial programme of events, it would be sensible to keep in mind the potential for further developing the project over the longer term.

The Next Steps
The first priority is to consult with and secure the support and participation of key stakeholders in Leicester, set up a steering committee and begin to plan the scope of the programme for Local Democracy Week.

Find out more about Speakers' Corner Trust:
http://www.speakerscornertrust.org/

AMPLIFIED LEICESTER: COMMUNITY DRIVEN SOCIAL IMPACT

Amy Sample-Ward
At Phoenix Square this morning, for the final fortnightly session in the current season of Amplified Leicester: "Community Driven Social Impact", led by Amy Sample-Ward.

In her biographical note, Amy describes herself as being "dedicated to supporting and educating organizations and changemakers in the use of evolving technologies that cultivate and engage communities. I am inspired by opportunities to catalyze community building and social action, online and offline, whether it’s through blogging, facilitating, training, or speaking. In 2009, I co-authored Social by Social, a handbook in using social technologies for social impact, and have had the great opportunity to contribute to additional publications about social media. I am the Global Community Development Manager for NetSquared, leading the strategy for our global Community both on and offline. I have worked in private philanthropy, advocacy nonprofit organizations, web design companies, and as a consultant."

This session focuses on strategies and case studies for creating successful community-driven media, events and campaigns. Participants learn about best practices and work in small groups to put learning into practice. This session include a presentation, discussion and small group scenarios. In our "small group scenario", we focus on four aspects of strategy. Below are the questions - and my answers to them, from the perspective of my own work.
1. Who is your community?
Faith communities (first and foremost, those represented on Leicester Council of Faiths; secondly, those faith communities who are not)
Wider "equalities" communities
City of Leicester at large
Fellow members/attendees at Amplified Leicester, CreativeCoffee Club etc
Other constituencies (education, mental health etc)
2. What do they want to do?
Improve/increase "community cohesion"
Promote good relations
Have their specific identity and contributions recognised, met and valued
3. Which tools would help?
Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
Constant Contact
Online maps
Blog
Foursquare
4. Which roles would help?
Key Contributors
Social Reporters
Community Manager
Tech Mentor
Amy gives me a complete set of the cards we used for this activity, which I'm sure will come in useful.

Toward the end of the session, Prof Sue Thomas fills us in on the format for Amplified Leicester when it returns in September. Rather than meet fortnightly on Wednesday mornings, we'll meet monthly on Wednesday evenings 1900-2000 (still at Phoenix Square, with the opportunity to socialise before and after). Each of these monthly meetings will be given over to a speaker or panel discussion. I've accepted Sue's offer to run a panel on Wednesday 23 March 2011, on "Amplified Communities of Faith and/or Belief".

Follow Amy Sample-Ward on Twitter: @amyrsward

Read Amy's blog: Amy Sample-Ward's version of NPTech

PRAYER SETS A TONE FOR DEBATE

This letter appears in today's Leicester Mercury:
Prayer sets a tone for debate
The subject of prayer has been at the centre of public debate in recent times.
Mr Mike Simpson joins in by declaring that prayer has no place prior to a meeting, debate or other such forums. He even proposes that the Leicester city councillors who did, and still do, engage in this very human act of sharing are not fit for office and should step down. I'll leave the reader to consider the ridiculous implications of his radical, secular view.
It is correct to say that the absence of prayer prior to a meeting may not change the order of who sits where, the agenda items or outcomes. What a short prayer does do, however, is set the tone at the very start by everyone silently declaring that no matter how heated the debate or polarising the views, all will treat others with respect. Mr Simpson may say this is unnecessary as it is taken for granted due respect will be given, not in my extensive experience of meetings Mr Simpson. When people are left to set their own level of respect standards, too many seem to fall well short of a reasonable standard.
A prayer at the start of a gathering for whatever reason, if conducted properly, can provide a benchmark of respect that has a tangible effect. As an example, consider the House of Commons. In debates, MPs consistently refer to each other as "Honourable friend''. This was introduced many, many years ago to remind MPs that during debate, a level of decorum and respect is expected. For the rest of us, a short prayer often suffices.
Whilst I have no doubt most secularists strive to be decent people, I suspect the active secularists would rejoice if prayers were generally dispensed with outside of religious services.
I say the world would be a much poorer place for it. I would implore all who follow a faith to firmly resist this attempt by secularists to deprive our children of the personal and collective benefits of sharing daily communal prayer as they grow. We need to reverse this secular fashion of individualism, disrespect and irresponsibility. Abandoning daily communal prayer is precisely what we do not need to do.
Stephen A Warden, Leicester

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

CITIZENS' EYE COMMUNITY NEWS CAFÉ, 27 JULY 2010


At Kona Blue Coffee, Highcross, for the regular Tuesday morning Community News Café, run by Citizens' Eye Community News Agency.  Alastair (my firstborn) is there and spends the whole time off to the side with a couple of local documentary film makers.

This morning we meet Laura Elvin, Trainee Reporter at the Leicester Mercury, who's coming into contact with Citizens' Eye for the first time.

These Community News Café sessions are held here twice every Tuesday, 0930-1030 and 1830-1930.

"I urge the Council of Faiths to respond"

A friend brings to my attention a letter in today's Leicester Mercury which is particular relevance to the Council of Faiths:
Let's lead the way on this issue

Suleman Nagdi (Mailbox, July 20) makes a strong ,but provocative, case for opposing any ban on the niqab: He doesn't mention the burka.

As he says, the French Assembly has passed a bill banning the niqab and the burka in public places and that piece of legislation now goes to their Senate. The Spanish Parliament, by contrast, has voted against a similar proposal.

A possible explanation is that France has a long tradition of fighting to maintain the principles of the 1789 revolution: liberty, equality and fraternity.

I see no reason for a British citizen not to respect their decision: A great deal of blood was spilt during that revolution.

The question is, do we want to follow the same path? Would, as Suleman Nagdi suggests, such a decision run counter to the "liberal values" of our country? The answer to that question depends upon your definition of liberal values.

Historically, this country is quite familiar with a decision by a woman to "take the veil''. It is unusual nowadays but in the past significant numbers of British women "took the veil", withdrew from society, joined a nunnery and no-one raised an eyebrow.

The change the indigenous population are having to deal with is the fact that not insignificant numbers of Muslim women come to this country, "take the veil" so to speak and do not withdraw from society. Quite the reverse, in fact. Some Muslim women "take the veil", get married, raise a family, drive their children to school and undertake employment.

That is contrary to the British tradition and some non-Muslims feel threatened by this behaviour. It is indeed a test for all the indigenous population. I doubt whether Suleman Nagdi, a reasonable man, would deny the existence of this test. Incidentally, I do not accept that "any change to the law will discourage particular groups from being active members of society''. Indeed there are good grounds for thinking that the removal of the Niqab at sensitive times and for specific events will lead to greater understanding and improved interfaith relations.

Whether this requires a change in the law is a matter for debate: I rather hope not.

In a liberal democracy, the way forward might be to look for a compromise. That requires very detailed knowledge of the subject by the parties charged with responsibility for negotiating the compromise. A public code of practice – not in any sense legally binding – would be admirable and would show that this city is leading the way on a matter of public interest. I urge The Council of Faiths to respond.

James Gore Browne, Leicester
After a few emails are sent round, and phone conversations with Manjula Sood (our Chair) and Suleman Nagdi, I get to work on drafting our response. Manjula and I have a meeting on another issue tomorrow afternoon (along with Tony Nelson, our Vice Chair). Hopefully, we'll agree on a text then which can be sent to the Mercury in reply.

Monday, 26 July 2010

REDP: END OF YEAR 1 EVALUATION


A couple of hours this morning in Coffee Republic, Granby Street with Bob Clarke, carrying out an evaluation of the first full year of the Regional Equality and Diversity Partnership (REDP). Bob is an independent consultant who helped us draw up the business plan submitted with our bid that helped us win this project. He's interviewing all the Core Partners in the project: Leicestershire Centre for Integrated Living (LCIL), Leicester Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Centre (LGBT Centre) and The Race Equality Centre (TREC). While in no way feeling self-satisfied or resting on our laurels, we'd feel justified in saying that our first year has been successful and I'm happy to admit that I've learned a lot on this project. Undoubtedly, the second year is going to be harder.

Thursday, 22 July 2010

MUSLIM WOMEN WHO WEAR FACE VEILS ARE SUFFERING RISE IN ABUSE AND HOSTILITY

This article appears in today's Leicester Mercury:
Muslim women who wear face veils are suffering rise in abuse and hostility
Muslim women who wear face veils say they are seeing a rising tide of hostility and abuse because of the way they dress.
Women spoke out as police reported a sharp rise in crimes, ranging from verbal abuse to physical attacks, against Muslims in the past year.
Two women who wear the niqab, a veil which leaves only the eyes showing, said Leicester had become more "hostile" since the French Government said it planned to ban the garment and the burka, which covers the entire body.
The women also believe publicity surrounding Conservative MP Philip Hollobone's decision to refuse to meet constituents wearing veils had deepened public hostility.
Mr Hollobone, an MP in Northamptonshire, also attempted to introduce a private member's bill in the House of Commons to pave the way for a law similar to that being considered in France.
One of the women, a 29-year-old from Leicester's Clarendon Park, said: "There is a more hostile than usual atmosphere at the moment.
"I have been called names like ''Taliban'' and ''terrorist'' and one man, who was drunk in the middle of the day, told me to go back to where I came from.
"I just want to live my life in accordance with my faith, I don't see what harm I am doing by wearing the niqab.
"People talk about women who wear these garments being outside of society in some way. I was born and brought up in this country and don't want to live anywhere else.
"I have been to university and I have a well-paid job, I live by the law and I love my family. How am I not taking part in society?"
Another woman, aged 32, from Evington, Leicester, said: "Women are saying that they feel intimidated by some of the comments they hear in the media or in the street.
"There seems to be this feeling now that women who choose to dress this way are some kind of threat to the British way of life."
Police in Leicester have seen the number of cases of Muslims being verbally abused or physically assaulted rise in the past year.
Between April 2008 and March 2009, officers in the city recorded 25 offences. In the following 12 months, it rose to 42.
Chief Inspector Bill Knopp, of Leicestershire police's community safety unit, said: "Although the number of offences is relatively low, it's the trend that concerns us.
"We cannot be sure whether that rise reflects greater public confidence and people are coming to us when these things happen to them or an actual rise in incidents.
"What I do know is that we are getting better at catching the offenders."
Suleman Nagdi, spokesman for the Leicestershire Federation of Muslim Organisations, said meetings had taken place with police to discuss the recent incidents.
He said: "The figures the police have only show the number of women who have come forward to tell them about their experiences.
"I fear there are others who have been abused in this way but have never told anyone about it.
"There is a debate going on, but calling people names in the street is never part of any debate."
Leicestershire police have a new hate crime website: www.stamp-it-out.co.uk

Wednesday, 21 July 2010

TREAT EVERYONE EQUALLY


This letter appears in today's Leicester Mercury:
Treat everyone equally
I found the Bishop of Leicester's article "Ban on religious symbols is not the way forward" (First Person, July 17) rather confused.
He states that "in secular societies religious symbols are increasingly seen as dangerous and problematic" and "in secular societies there is always a tendency to get anxious about expressions of religion".
I would suggest that it has nothing to do with whether or not a society is secular, but on whether the constituent parts of that society are comfortable with each other. Indeed, I think the Bishop would probably find a high proportion of his own congregation would advocate banning full face veils.
As a member of Leicester Secular Society, I can say that we are certainly not unanimous in our approach to this issue, but we do maintain that all must be treated equally, regardless of religion. We also believe that people should have the greatest possible freedom both in action and speech.
As a man, I find the idea that a woman wants to hide their face from me because she thinks I am a threat to her and is not prepared to allow full communication with me (of which facial expression is an important part) offensive. However, it is necessary if we are to live in a free society to tolerate both actions and speech that offend.
I suggest that in the case of the "'wooden-headed bureaucratic silliness' that stopped Christians wearing religious symbols at work" the correct solution would be to advocate getting the rules on what can be worn changed for all, rather than demanding an exception for a particular religious symbol.
People should be allowed to cover their faces where they so wish, but where this is problematic, all should have to show their faces.
Where motorcycle helmets and hoodies are not allowed, the same should apply to the full veil, with no exception on the basis of religion.
John Catt, Loughborough