Showing posts with label David Clark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Clark. Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

MY JEWISH SOUL

Anthony & Ann Gimpel
At Quaker Meeting House, Queens Road, this evening for the launch of Anthony Gimpel's new book, My Jewish Soul (published by Christians Aware).

There are more than 60 people in the room when Barbara Butler (Executive Secretary, Christians Aware) opens the meeting, inviting David Patterson to speak first. David is a neighbour of Anthony Gimpel and his wife Ann in Loughborough. He speaks about Anthony's influence on the way that Holocaust Memorial Day is commemorated there and how this is informed by Anthony's personal engagement with the Holocaust, as described in the book.

In the worldview Anthony espouses in his book, forgiveness must come before understanding, not the other way round as has long persisted in the classic British liberal model espoused by influential figures such as George Eliot and John Stuart Mill. Understanding oneself comes before understanding others. So  it follows that in order to understand oneself, one must forgive oneself.

Anthony - and of course his book - are deeply influenced by Quaker spirituality. The book is a search for his own inner soul, but at each stage of that search, it shows how he is engaged with the outer world: family, community, society, the world, always leading back to himself.

Next to speak is Ruth Fraser. She, in common with Anthony, describes herself as a Jewish Quaker. She offers the memorable observation that for a Jew to dwell on the Holocaust feels like applying a Brillo Pad to the soul.

David Clark, speaking next, says that he would locate the essence of Anthony's book on page 57: but he won't say what that is, or read the passage to us. If we want to find out for ourselves, we should buy the book! For the sake of the blog, I prevail upon him later and he points out the following paragraphs:
A friend was asking me about prayer. I answered saying that perhaps prayer is what happens when your heart genuinely wants something and the universe responds. It is instructive to hear my friend's comment: She said something like "you mean when I really want in my heart to do something." No, that is not what I meant. You may think it is what I said but listen carefully and notice the addition of one little word in her comment: I. It is quite different for your heart to want something and for you to want something in your heart. In the first case the universe responds: in the second the universe remains silent. That is why "I want never gets."
So what then do I mean about the universe responding? Being aware of what your heart is saying may allow you to be aware of the response of the universe but that is not a given. The response may or ay not accord with your conscious understanding. You may or may not want what the universe if going to give you. Do you really know what your heart wants? Is your ego happy with this? Will you accept the consequences? Only you can know and the universe is not particularly bothered whether you do or not. The key is your self awareness. Your ego and your conscience are irrelevant. It is neither here not there.

Just before this meeting, early news reports of the incident in Woolwich begin breaking. I get the feeling I'm the only one who knows about it, from the simple fact that no one else mentions it. Something of a contrast to what's been going on here this evening, I'm sure you'll agree, faithful reader.

Thursday, 3 February 2011

UNREALISTIC RELIGIOUS VIEW

This letter appears in today's Leicester Mercury:
Unrealistic religious view
Although undoubtedly sincere, the column from the Rev David H Clark (First Person, January 21) about why some Anglicans cannot take the road to Rome is very short on any kind of reason or logic.
Basically it seems to be saying "I don't want to be Catholic because I don't like some Catholic teachings" – never mind what is true and what is not.
The "gay" issue is quoted; the Catholic Church cares for all, but is not afraid to say what is instantly obvious from even the natural law, that physical homosexual acts are quite wrong.
Papal infallibility is grossly misrepresented: in fact it refers only to papal teachings given as universal shepherd to the flock on matters of faith and morals. Why should conformity to defined dogma or truth be a problem?
Who says that the Catholic views on sex, gender and clerical celibacy, and the ordination of women are "unjustifiable"? Abortion is a posh word for murder of an unborn child, and even many Anglican clergy would regard marriage as indissoluble.
To sum up, it is not possible for abortion, and other issues, to be both right and wrong. Anybody who wants freedom to believe something wrong is something right, or vice versa, is being unrealistic.
Hugh Montefiori was, of course, well known for lack of orthodoxy; and my Anglican friends had little time for what he preached.
Mark W Jacques, OP, Quorn

Saturday, 29 January 2011

"COMING HOME" TO QUAKERS

This letter appears in today's Leicester Mercury:
"Coming home" to Quakers
David Clark (First Person, January 21) explains the dilemma of many within the traditional Christian churches, in wanting to remain part of a worshipping community, but finding difficulty with some of the doctrines, whether they be Catholic, Anglican or Islamic. 
As one confirmed long ago in the Church of England, I know how hard it is to break from the fellowship of a faith community, but we cannot hide our doubts. I once heard a great churchman, Canon Charles Raven, say: "Your doubts are your growing points". 
My doubts led me to Quakers in the Society of Friends. Quakers have no creeds and no set prayers or hymns that oblige us to repeat things we cannot believe. Instead Quakers rely on silent communion – meeting together to experience a deep sense of peace and spiritual renewal. Our meetings are open to anyone who wants to share an hour of silent Sunday worship (10.30am, the Meeting House, Queens Road).
We don't have to dress up to go to meetings and we certainly don't wear Quaker Oats hats. In fact, we like to think that, generally speaking, we are really quite normal!
Malcolm Elliott, Leicester