Showing posts with label VS Naipaul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VS Naipaul. Show all posts

Friday, 6 April 2012

COUNCILLOR FACING PROBE OVER MESSAGE CRITICISING MUSLIMS

This article appears in today's Leicester Mercury:
Councillor facing probe over message criticising Muslims
A Leicestershire county councillor is being investigated after distributing a leaflet which criticised Muslims.
Earlier this year, Graham Partner – who quit the BNP to sit as an independent – sent out a New Year message to voters in his Coalville division.
It featured part of an article from a national newspaper which said victimhood "comes easily" to followers of Islam.
The article added: "Every terrorist atrocity, every blood- soaked massacre is justified by reference to imagined grievances. But the greatest persecutors of other faiths are Muslim, themselves.
"The response from the Western church leaders is deafening silence, afraid to accept that their ideological paradise of multi-cultural, multi-faith, left-wing society is nothing more than a fantasy."
Two county councillors and two parish councillors lodged a complaint, and the county council's standards board is now investigating.
Conservative Peter Lewis, said: "The leaflet certainly cocked a snook at the county's equality and human rights policies, and as it was issued in his role as a county councillor, it reflected badly, in my view, on the council.
"It certainly seemed to me designed not to build bridges or foster tolerance but to stir up and fire division and hatred around the same period as the EDL march (which took place in Leicester in February).
Mr Partner has resigned from the BNP but has clearly retained its combative posture."
Coun Partner said the complaints were politically motivated, and insisted the leaflet was well-received by people living in his ward. He also said the message was not penned by him, but copied from and attributed to Daily Express columnist Leo McKinstry.
He said: "Most of the people who received one of the leaflets said they agreed with what was printed. The only complaints the council has received are from politicians who want to get me into trouble. I didn't write the article, it was an extract from a piece printed in a national newspaper."
The findings of the investigation will be presented to the council's cross-party standards panel of councillors soon.
If Coun Partner is found to have broken the code of conduct, he could face censure ranging from a written warning to suspension.
Controversial: An extract from the leaflet
The narrative of victimhood comes easily to followers of Islam. They constantly bemoan the prejudice they have to endure and the oppression they suffer in the bigoted western world, where Islamophobia is supposedly rampant.
Every terrorist atrocity, every blood-soaked massacre is justified by reference to imagined grievances. But by far the greatest persecutors of other faiths are Muslim hard-liners themselves.
The great Caribbean writer VS Naipaul once described Islam as “sanctified rage”. The proof of those words has been graphically illustrated by a growing catalogue of barbarities committed by Islamic militants against Christians.
Suleman Nagdi, spokesman for the Leicestershire Federation of Muslim Organisations, says in response: “As a holder of public office, one must uphold the highest standards of conduct which aregeared towards unitingand not dividing them.
“The Muslim community was the target of the leaflets which simplified very complex issues. Extremism exists in society and must be rooted out.
“Christians and Muslims have superb relations which councillors and others should take time to learn about rather than picking dubious examples to suit political purposes.”

Monday, 9 January 2012

OUR CHERISHED RIGHTS HAVE BEEN THE RESULT OF A LONG STRUGGLE

This letter appears in today's Leicester Mercury:
Our cherished rights have been the result of a long struggle
Michael Myers (Mailbox, December 29) seems to be mainly concerned over my assertion (First Person, December 11) that "we are a country that belongs to all who live here and where all share equally in deciding its future".
Of course we already have a culture, a good one, and this is important; but it is also important to note that we have fought for it, forged it, and improved it over the centuries, and that a driving perception has been that we all count equally and share equally in taking it further.
So I make my assertion, agreeing with St Thomas Aquinas ("It is through culture that man lives a truly human life."), V S Naipaul ("if a man picks himself up and comes to another country he must meet it halfway"), and especially with Colonel Rainsborough at the Putney Debates, 1647: "...for really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he; and therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear, that every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government; and I do think that the poorest man in England is not bound in a strict sense to that government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under..."
And please note that the Putney Debates started in St Mary's Church simply because it was convenient. These were secular debates before the General Council of the Army. The demands were political demands from the soldiers addressed to the establishment and the landowners.
We should be teaching our children about the struggle that has gone on to get the rights that we value.
A good overview is the excellent website from the British Library, 2008 exhibition, "Taking Liberties".
Allan Hayes, Leicester