Thursday 23 September 2010

EDL/UAF briefing for Voluntary & Community Sector


To Leicester Town Hall this evening, for a briefing session jointly hosted by the City Council and Leicestershire Constabulary, updating us on preparations for the visit of the English Defence League, as well as the proposed counter-demonstration by Unite Against Fascism, on Saturday 9 October. There are a dozen or so attendees, specifically invited, representing a variety of Voluntary and Community Sector organisations, working across the city or based and operating in specific parts or with specific communities. I'm accompanied by Gursharan Thandi, who (as well as sitting on the Board of Directors of Leicester Council of Faiths) is also one of two representatives for communities of interest in terms of religion and belief on Leicester Partnership.

Below is a copy of the presentation we were given this evening, word-for-word. My occasional interpolations are in brackets.

An overview of the proposed march and counter-demonstration

Briefing for Voluntary and Community Sector Stakeholders
Leicestershire Constabulary, Leicester City Council

Agenda
·      Introduction: Councillor Veejay Patel [Leader, Leicester City Council]
·      Overview Briefing: Sheila Lock [Chief Executive, Leicester City Council], [Chief Superintendent] Rob Nixon [City Commander]
·      Q&A
·      Summary of main action points

Who are we talking to?
·      Four Levels
·      The community stakeholder groups
·      Key partners in the public sector
·      The media
·      The EDL themselves and any counter protest groups

Objectives
·      Reassurance that we are working together
·      Let you know what we know
·      Make you aware of the legal position
·      Tell you what the police and council are doing
·      Inform you of what the police role is
·      Inform you of what the council role is
·      Explore what your role could be
·      Discuss next steps in relation to this event
·      Discuss how we as a city “move on” after this event

What we know
·      An early indication of an intent to march in September that came to nothing – through informal routes
·      Indication to the police from the English Defence League (EDL) that they intend to stage a march in Leicester city centre on Saturday October 9
·      The EDL formed in June 2009 – not legally defined as an extreme right wing group – previous events in the country have attracted those with strong right wing views
·      Indication from Unite Against Fascism (UAF) that they wish to hold a counter-demonstration
·      Application received on 15 September by UAF
·      Busy day for City – open day for universities (7000 international visitors), Somali event (smaller event), National Trade Union Conference, Navratri, Saturday morning Cathedral Service (600 people) – following day, Leicester Marathon [Option simply to close everything down for the day was considered, but it was decided in the end to go for “business as usual” – although taking this route requires that there be a strong plan in place.]

Legal position
·      Any ban for a march has to be made by the Council to the Home Secretary.  Supported by evidence that can demonstrate significant risk of disorder and risk to cohesion
·      Even if ban is applied for and is successful does not prevent static demonstrations taking place.  EDL can still come to Leicester
·      No legal powers to prevent a lawful peaceful protest
·      Legislative changes since BNP ban in 2001

What are Police and Council doing?
·      We take our community leadership role very seriously
·      Working with partnership agencies to jointly plan and manage the response to the event and any issues that arise before or after
·      Learning the lessons from other areas who have had similar events [good practice and bad]
·      Police and council engaging and listening to all communities
·      Police are in dialogue with groups who may seek to protest/counter demonstrate on the day
·      Exploring all our legal powers [e.g. ban on sale of alcohol in city centre on the day, management of public transport network]
·      Planning will continue in the weeks ahead – continued liaison
·      Police and council have considerable experience in planning events
·      Dealing with this in an objective way that is professional, to do otherwise leaves the city open to challenge and potential further risk

Police role
·      Facilitate peaceful protest and comply with duty under Human Rights Act
·      If anyone commits a criminal offence will be dealt with fairly but firmly
·      We will not tolerate damage to the city or acts of violence
·      Anyone involved in violence, disorder or racist behaviour which is unlawful will be liable to prosecution
·      Celebrate diversity and be proud of our city

Council Role
·      To exercise its community leadership role for the city – in partnership with others
·      To follow a lawful decision making process that considers objectively all the available advice and views
·      To make an application on behalf of the city to the Secretary of State if that is the outcome following the lawful process
·      Actively working with the Police to enhance security and traffic management
·      Clear united leadership [not a party issue; everyone putting political differences aside to work together for the good of the city, both Leadership and Opposition]

As community leaders: your role
·      Conveying the strength of feeling in Leicester is important, but so is conveying it in the right way
·      Support for non confrontational means
·      Getting out the message re consultation and alternative events
·      Helping to identify “vulnerable” groups and individuals [and sites] and providing diversionary activity

The message to the community
·      If you feel strongly about what is happening, express those views to your local councillor, trade union branch, community or faith leader or to the council chief executive so that your view can be fed into the decision making process.
·      If you are concerned please speak to your local police.
·      The police and council want to reassure and support all communities and encourage them not to be provoked into reacting to the protests [need to be sensitive to changes in mood as the day approaches]
·      We don’t want people coming into the city intent on confronting any protestors.  Please let the police handle events.
·      We would ask that you don’t get drawn into inflammatory dialogue on social networking sites.
·      If you want to come to Leicester to shop/normal business expect some disruption.  Busy but wish to see business as usual.
·      Celebrate in City event. [to take place on Sunday 10, the day following the march and counter-demonstration]

What next?
·      We will promise to keep you informed as the situation develops
·      To help us we really need a two-way conversation – tell us your concerns or any information you think we need to know.
·      [email only opened at start of this week, but already more than 500 posts received]
·      If you don’t want to speak to the police or council speak to a community leader who will speak to us on your behalf.
·      Any questions?

Several minutes are given over to questions, answers and comments at the end, in which all those attending (including Gursharan and I) take the opportunity to chip in. Our Chair, Manjula Sood, had been to a similar breifing held in the same place the night before. She called me this afternoon and asked me to make sure that I'd speak here this evening. I said that, if the opportunity arose – "Don't wait for opportunity", she told me, "You should speak!" This evening's proceedings are being webcast; comments made here will form part of the body of evidence required for the City Council when making its decision whether to apply to the Home Office for an order to ban the march at its emergency Cabinet meeting tomorrow. Manjula doesn't want the meeting to go on record without something being heard from the Council of Faiths – and quite right too.

Well I've never exactly been backward at coming forward, so: several times this evening, Sheila has mentioned a meeting of the Faiths Leaders Forum this coming Monday, at which those present will agree a joint statment expressing a united view about 9 October. So I take the floor briefly to explain the distinction between the Faith Leaders Forum and the Council of Faiths, and the different functions they perform, saying how each supports and complements the other. While I'm on, I say that one of our objectives at the Council of Faiths is to collate and disseminate accurate infomation, as a way of building up confidence and playing down fears. We don't want our members or those they represent to be influenced by rumour. When I say that I'll be putting the text of the PowerPoint presentation on our blog, Sheila responds over the mic by saying, "That's just what we were hoping for" and giving me a double thumbs-up.

As the meeting nears its end, Gursharan expresses her heartfelt view that, as difficult as this issue is, it presents us with the opportunity to do the right thing by our city and its people and how we’ll be judged by our actions on 9 October and on the days leading up to it and following it. As she's speaking, what comes to mind is the recent meetings that Sheila Lock has convened on promoting Leicester as a centre of excellence in community cohesion - at which we're discussing how to bottle "essence of Leicester" and promote it around the country and further afield. The coming weeks will test out whether we really can walk the walk here or do we just talk the talk. Is our unity in diversity genuine or will it crumble at the first real challenge?

Gursharan's words nicely set up Councillor Mohammed Dawood, Cabinet Lead for Community Cohesion, who sums up the meeting and signs off on a positive and upbeat note.

No comments:

Post a Comment