Thursday, 13 December 2012

CENSUS SHOWS THE TIMES THEY ARE A-CHANGIN'

Harry Perry's First Person column appears in today's Leicester Mercury (but not on the website):

Census shows the times they are a-changin'
Harry Perry, president of the Leicester Secular Society, gives his view on lessons from the census
As the new President of Leicester Secular Society, my particular interest in the 2011 Census has been data relating to religion and belief in Leicester. These stats are quite different from the national averages, revealing a city that is more diverse than most other places and, notably, where the four main belief categories (Christian; Non-religious; Muslim and Hind) are relatively evenly balanced, with a sizeable number of Sikhs too.
The new figures show that the number of Christians (of ALL denominations) is now down to only 32% of Leicester's population. Those without religion (atheists) are the second largest group with almost 23%, while Muslims check in at nearly 19% and Hindus at just over 15%, Sikhs are at about 4.5%. In other words, no single belief group is anywhere near dominant.
I believe this means that no spokesman for any single religion can be seen as a moral spokesman for the city. Each belief community has something to offer in this respect.
The key objective of Leicester Secular Society is to achieve a "separation of religion from the state". We have no desire to ban religion, worship of gods or religious rituals. These are matters of personal conscience and we will do as much as anybody to protect those fundamental rights.
Indeed in a world where religion often seeks to impose its dogmas on to society as a whole it is increasingly obvious that only a secular state can guarantee freedom of religion and belief for all.
We believe strongly that religion can divide people against each other, especially when national or local government gives favoured status to one belief over the rest.
This is why we have campaigned against the creation of ever-more publicly funded "faith" schools and have called for the ending of religious rituals in public bodies, like prayers in council meetings and the religious ceremony to welcome a new lord mayor.
This is why we believe that national and local celebrations of events like Remembrance Day for those killed in war should not be based on a specific religious ritual but on secular respect, reflecting that those who died had many different beliefs.
This is why we must question the financial privileges given to religious bodies, such as publicly funded chaplains in hospitals, prisons and armed forces. If the religious want them, then it is obvious who should pay.
In terms of policy making it is time that those who live good lives without religion were given proper respect with consultation alongside religious bodies.
We must stand by "one law for all". The new Census statistics must give all the city's policy-makers and opinion formers pause for thought.
Harry Perry, Leicester Secular Society

1 comment:

  1. While it is true that one denomination/faith cannot truly represent the moral values and belief-sets of another, the same stands true for a secular (atheist) representative. An atheist cannot possibly come close to understanding or representing the values of someone who dedicates their life to a particular path, in the same way a person of faith cannot comprehend a secular life. The best option for Leicester may be for an amalgamation of spokespersons - although it may be necessary to have several representatives or a rotating period of office to avoid convolution and dilution. Dogma is as synonymous with religion as it is with secularism as all philosophy and evidence is based on a system (reality) which is subjective by nature. Science is dogmatic, limited to the small spectrum of observational, concrete, measurable biological and mechanical algorithms. Religion is dogmatic, based on the metaphysical and expanded by the intangible and the abstract. Both are prone to flaws and are fairly limited ways of thinking BUT they are the best we have and serve their place perfectly well, depending on the individual. Some people are abstract, some are logical and some are balanced. We all of us have the capacity to love and live in peace but first we need to stop asking external questions and start listening to the answers which emanate from inside us. We each have different questions so will each have different answers - we cannot possibly expect a ONE FOR ALL attitude.

    ReplyDelete